<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The survey that launched a thousand pornos</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.archenemy.org/2007/05/29/the-survey-that-launched-a-thousand-pornos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.archenemy.org/2007/05/29/the-survey-that-launched-a-thousand-pornos/</link>
	<description>rum, bloggery &#38; the lash</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 23 Nov 2008 12:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: jmd</title>
		<link>http://blog.archenemy.org/2007/05/29/the-survey-that-launched-a-thousand-pornos/#comment-963</link>
		<dc:creator>jmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 20:28:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archenemy.org/?p=959#comment-963</guid>
		<description>I bet the porn industry is well ahead of the "scientists" on this one.
I'm sure there are already (several) porn flicks called "Addicted to Cock" or "Cum Junkie".  I would google and link, but am at work.  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I bet the porn industry is well ahead of the &#8220;scientists&#8221; on this one.<br />
I&#8217;m sure there are already (several) porn flicks called &#8220;Addicted to Cock&#8221; or &#8220;Cum Junkie&#8221;.  I would google and link, but am at work.  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dff</title>
		<link>http://blog.archenemy.org/2007/05/29/the-survey-that-launched-a-thousand-pornos/#comment-964</link>
		<dc:creator>dff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 19:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archenemy.org/?p=959#comment-964</guid>
		<description>Oh, I completely agree with you - but that doesn't make this any less hilarious, or any less likely to be picked up on by the porn industry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I completely agree with you - but that doesn&#8217;t make this any less hilarious, or any less likely to be picked up on by the porn industry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jmd</title>
		<link>http://blog.archenemy.org/2007/05/29/the-survey-that-launched-a-thousand-pornos/#comment-965</link>
		<dc:creator>jmd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 May 2007 18:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.archenemy.org/?p=959#comment-965</guid>
		<description>Not that I have actually read any of your links, and not that I want the positive effects of semen to be false but the science seems a bit suspect.
My theories:
- depressed women are much more uptight, and would tend to use condoms more than the happier, free wheelin' sluts who don't.
- Happy, free wheelin' sluts get depressed when they don't get any on a regular basis.
- Women who don't use condoms would tend to be, or think they are, in a steady monogomous relationship and would be happier than those sleeping around who need protection against STDs and pregnancy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that I have actually read any of your links, and not that I want the positive effects of semen to be false but the science seems a bit suspect.<br />
My theories:<br />
- depressed women are much more uptight, and would tend to use condoms more than the happier, free wheelin&#8217; sluts who don&#8217;t.<br />
- Happy, free wheelin&#8217; sluts get depressed when they don&#8217;t get any on a regular basis.<br />
- Women who don&#8217;t use condoms would tend to be, or think they are, in a steady monogomous relationship and would be happier than those sleeping around who need protection against STDs and pregnancy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
